Factual comparison · No overclaiming

Bitwarden Alternative
for Technical Teams

Bitwarden is a strong, genuinely open-source password manager. SealedKeys is different in specific ways that matter to some teams. This is an honest comparison — we've noted where Bitwarden has the advantage too.

Feature comparison

FeatureSealedKeysBitwarden
Zero-knowledge architecture
Both are genuinely zero-knowledge
Open-source encryption
Both publish encryption code
SAML 2.0 SSO included in standard plan
Teams/Enterprise tier only
SSH key storage (dedicated type)
Workaround via secure notes
API key storage (dedicated type)
Workaround via custom fields
EU data residency
US-hosted by default; EU option on Enterprise
Cyber Essentials certified
Not certified
Browser extension
Roadmap
Mobile apps (iOS / Android)
Web only currently
Self-hosted option
Cloud-only
Price (teams, per user/month)
Bitwarden Teams; SSO extra
£3.49~£3.99+

Pricing and features may change. Verify directly with each vendor before making a decision.

Where SealedKeys differs

SSH and API key types

Bitwarden stores SSH keys and API tokens as secure notes or with custom fields — they don't have a dedicated field layout. SealedKeys has dedicated SSH key and API key types with the right fields for each.

SSO in standard Pro plan

Bitwarden requires the Teams or Enterprise tier for SSO. SealedKeys includes SAML 2.0 SSO in the standard Pro plan at £3.49/user/month.

EU data residency without Enterprise pricing

Bitwarden offers EU data residency on Enterprise plans. SealedKeys is EU-hosted by default on all plans.

Cyber Essentials certification

SealedKeys is UK Cyber Essentials certified. Bitwarden is not. This matters for UK government supply chain requirements.

Where Bitwarden has the advantage

Browser extension and mobile apps

Bitwarden has mature browser extensions and mobile apps with auto-fill. SealedKeys is currently web-only. If auto-fill is important, Bitwarden has a clear advantage.

Self-hosted option

Bitwarden can be self-hosted. SealedKeys is cloud-only.

Larger ecosystem and community

Bitwarden has been around since 2015 and has a large open-source community, third-party clients and integrations. SealedKeys is earlier-stage.

Frequently asked questions

Is SealedKeys also open source?+

The encryption implementation is open source on GitHub at github.com/sealedkeys/crypto. The application code (server, API, UI) is not currently open source. Bitwarden is fully open source.

Can I import my Bitwarden vault into SealedKeys?+

Yes. Export your Bitwarden vault as a JSON file and import it into SealedKeys. The importer supports the Bitwarden JSON format and maps secret types appropriately.

Is Bitwarden more secure than SealedKeys?+

Both use zero-knowledge architecture with AES-256-GCM encryption. Both publish their encryption implementations. Neither has a demonstrable security advantage over the other in terms of cryptographic design. Bitwarden has a longer track record and more independent audits.

Does SealedKeys plan to add a browser extension?+

Yes, a browser extension is on the roadmap. It would close the auto-fill gap with Bitwarden and provide process-isolated memory protection that a web app cannot offer.

Which is better for UK government supply chain requirements?+

SealedKeys is Cyber Essentials certified and EU-hosted by default — both relevant for UK public sector supply chain work. Bitwarden is not Cyber Essentials certified and requires Enterprise for EU hosting.

Related

Try SealedKeys alongside your current tool

25 items free. Import your Bitwarden JSON export. No credit card required.